On the separation of powers and the separation of state and Church: Remarks on the resignation of the Hungarian president
Abstract
The resignation of the Hungarian president in February 2024 not only proved to be a political issue, but also raised important questions of constitutional law. The event raised fundamental questions about issues such as parliamentarism, the separation of powers, political responsibility, and the separation of church and state. This paper presents a theoretic analysis, examining why reality seems to differ from constitutional law textbooks. Constitutionalists have generally interpreted the separation of church and state in an institutional way, considering the relationship between the various “structures”. In this paper, however, a different aspect of the topic has emerged, namely the intertwining of church and state positions. How should situations be handled when church leaders are involved in politics? This paper concludes that the relationship between the president and the government has changed drastically, even though the text of the constitution remains unaltered. This change has introduced the political responsibility of the president, an aspect that previously seemed unthinkable. Another aspect relates to the separation of church and state. It has become evident that this relationship is not just a structural matter, but one that also involves personal relationships.
Keywords:
Hungary, separation of powers, Church-State relations, president, political responsibility, separation of Church and StateReferences
Cepl, Vojtech, Mark Gillis. 1993/1994. „Czech Republic.” East European Constitutional Review 2 (4)/3 (1): 64-68.
Constant, Benjamin. 1836. Cours de politique constitutionnelle. Paris: Didier.
Csink, Lóránt. 2021. „The legal regulations of religious symbols in the public sphere in Hungary.” In: Religious symbols in the public sphere: Analysis on certain Central European countries, ed. Paweł Sobczyk, 73–101. Budapest–Miskolc: Ferenc Mádl Institute of Comparative Law, Central European Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54237/profnet.2021.psrs. (Crossref)
Csink, Lóránt. 2022. „Presidents.” In: Comparative constitutionalism in Central Europe: Analysis on certain Central and Eastern European countries, eds. Lóránt Csink, László Trócsányi, 319–337. Miskolc–Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.lcslt.ccice. (Crossref)
Duverger, Maurice. 1978. Échec au Roi. Paris: Albin Michel.
Elgie, Robert. 2010. „Semi-presidentialism, cohabitation and the collapse of electoral democracies, 1990–2008.” Government and Opposition 45 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1 U l/j,1477-7053.2009.01303.x. (Crossref)
Kopecky, Petr, Ania van den Meerkrok-Paszkowska, Marc van den Muyzenberg. 1995. „Hatalom és stabilitás. Az elnöki intézmény négy közép-európai országban.” Társadalmi Szemle 7: 78–86.
Koudelka, Zdenĕk. 2014. „A közvetlen államfőválasztás kérdése a Cseh Köztársaságban.” Közjogi Szemle 7 (1): 17–25.
Kovács, Virág. 2013. „A köztársasági elnök és a végrehajtó hatalom.” In: Az államfő jogállása I, eds. Lóránt Csink, István Szabó, 37–50. Budapest: Pázmány Press.
Linz, Juan J. 1992. „Az elnöki rendszer veszélyei.” Politikatudományi Szemle 1 (1): 142–159.
Petrétei, József. 2013. Magyarország alkotmányjoga II. Államszervezet. Pécs: Kodifikátor Alapítvány.
Petrétei, József. 2018. A köztársasági elnöki intézmény a magyar alkotmányjogban 1989-2014. Pécs: Kodifikátor Alapítvány.
Smailagić, Nedžad. 2020. „Rethinking amnesty and clemency in countries in transition: A comparative analysis of laws and practices in countries of the former Yugoslavia.” In: Executive clemency: Comparative and empirical perspectives, eds. Daniel Pascoe, Andrew Novak, 76–95. New York–London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367243586-4. (Crossref)
Sólyom, László. 2009. „A köztársasági elnök szerepe az alapjogok megvédelmezésében.” Iustum Aequum Salutare 5 (2): 83–92.
Taras, Ray. 2003. „Executive leadership: Presidents and governments.” In: Developments in Central and East European politics 3, eds. Stephen White, Judy Batt, Paul G. Lewis, 115–132. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pázmány Péter Catholic University
Professor, Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Szentkirályi utca 28, 1088 Budapest, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-086XLicense
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
- Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
- Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
- With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
- This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
