The right to education versus the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own convictions in ECHR case law

Jacek Falski

Polish Academy of Sciences , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-3887


Abstract

European Court of Human Rights case law, based on the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, regards the right to education, as per Article 2 of Protocol No 1 to the Convention, as “essential for the exercise of human rights.” The paper discusses and summarizes the current status of ECHR case law in the subject matter with a particular focus on the issue of the right of parents for respect of their convictions, including the religious ones, in the context of the exercise of the right to education. It also addresses the consequences of the translation of such parental convictions into children’s rights. The Strasbourg Court associates the requirement to protect parents’ convictions related mainly to the freedom of conscience and religion with the pluralism of ideas, the latter being one of the foundations of a democratic society. In this context, the Court also protects parental convictions against improper, excessive proselytism of the state as far as the educational process is concerned. Parents’ unreasonable proselytism within the scope of the exercise of the right to education is also unacceptable. Since the 1970s, case law in this respect has developed. It reflects the Court’s attempts to create a compromise between the protection of children’s rights and the respect of the rights of parents, while the child’s interests are always regarded as a priority.

Keywords:

Human rights, European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, ECHR case law, Right to education, Law on Religion, religious freedom, freedom of conscience and religion



Achour Ben Y., L’islam et la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, „Revue Générale de Droit International Public” 2007, nr 2.

Dupuy P.M., Boisson de Chazournes L., Protocole 1 – Article 2, w: L.E. Pettiti, E. Decaux, P.H. Imbert, La Convention européenne des droits de l’homme. Commentaire article par article, Paris 1995.

Falski J., Krzyż w szkole publicznej w orzecznictwie europejskim, „Sprawy Narodowościowe” 2010, nr 37.

Gonzales G., Le droit à l’instruction au sens de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, „Revue Française de Droit Administrative” 2010, nr 5.

Hucał M., Wolność sumienia i wyznania w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, Warszawa 2012.

Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności, red. L. Garlicki, t. 2, Warszawa 2011.

Levinet M., La conciliation du droit à l’instruction de l’enfant et de l’obligation de respecter les convictions religieuses des parents à la lumiere de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, „Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme” 2011, nr 87.

Nowicki M.A., Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka. Wybór orzeczeń 2009, Warszawa 2010.

Nowicki M.A., Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej, Warszawa 1992.

Sobczak W., Wolność myśli sumienia i religii. Poszukiwanie standardu europejskiego, Toruń 2013.

Wolność religii. Wybór materiałów. Dokumenty. Orzecznictwo, oprac. T. Jasudowicz, Toruń 2001.


Published
2014-12-30


Falski, J. (2014). Prawo do nauki a prawo rodziców do zapewnienia wychowania i nauczania zgodnie z ich przekonaniami w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Studia Z Prawa Wyznaniowego, 17, 151–172. https://doi.org/10.31743/spw.5117

Jacek Falski 
Polish Academy of Sciences

Dr hab., Institute of Law Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Nowy Świat 72, 00-330 Warszawa, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-3887



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
  2. Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
  3. Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
  4. With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
  5. This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.