On a verbal offence against religious feelings – commentary on the European Court of Human Rights’ judgement of 15 September 2022 in Rabczewska v. Poland
Lidia K. Jaskuła
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-5826
Abstract
In its judgement of 15 September 2022 in the case of Rabczewska v. Poland (App. No. 8257/13), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) held that the conviction of a Polish singer for her statement made during a press interview – “It’s hard to believe in the writings of someone wasted from drinking wine and smoking some weed,” referring to the authors of the Bible – violated Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The findings and conclusions presented by the ECtHR in this case significantly differ from those given by the domestic courts. Despite the shortcomings identified in this study, the ECtHR’s judgement deserves approval. This underscores that adjudication by the domestic courts under Article 196 of the Criminal Code, which penalises insulting religious feelings, cannot be divorced from the Convention’s standards. Moreover, the ECtHR’s judgement in Rabczewska v. Poland requires that domestic courts engage in thorough reflection on the essence of insulting religious feelings in light of the ECtHR’s rulings. Accordingly, a clear standard for ECtHR adjudication in cases involving freedom of expression and the protection of religious feelings is highly desirable. Therefore, the ECtHR should eliminate all deficiencies in argumentation, gaps and substantive errors from its justifications of judgements.
Keywords:
freedom of expression, religious feelings, human rights, Rabczewska v. Poland, Polish Criminal Code, European Court of Human Rights, ECtHRReferences
Bhatia, Gautam. 2021. “Religious speech.” In: The Oxford handbook of freedom of speech, eds. Adrienne Stone, Frederick Schauer, 499–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Doe, Norman. 2011. Law and religion in Europe: A comparative introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Evans, Carolyn. 2001. Freedom of religion under the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Gegenava, Dimitry. 2022. “Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case.” Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego 25: 91–105. https://doi.org/10.31743/spw.14126. (Crossref)
Hauksdóttir, Eva. 2021. “Restricting freedom of expression for religious peace: On the ECHR’s approach to blasphemy.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 2: 75–118. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10008. (Crossref)
Hill, Mark. 2020. “Limitations on freedom of religion: Assessing the reach of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights”. In: Staat – Religion – Recht. Festschrift für Gerhard Robbers zum 70. Geburtstag, eds. Kerstin von der Decken, Angelika Günzel, 815–830. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. (Crossref)
Jaskuła, Lidia Katarzyna. 2010. “Ochrona uczuć religijnych odbiorcy – granice wolności wypowiedzi artystycznej. Wybrane aspekty prawne.” Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego 13: 161–177.
Jaskuła, Lidia Katarzyna. 2011. “Uczucia religijne jako granica wolności wypowiedzi (wybrane zagadnienia prawne).” In: Praktyczne aspekty wolności wypowiedzi, eds. Wojciech Lis, Zbigniew Husak, 359–380. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Kamiński, Ireneusz Cezary. 2010. Ograniczenia swobody wypowiedzi dopuszczalne w Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Analiza krytyczna. Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business.
Kamiński, Ireneusz Cezary. 2016. “Wolność wypowiedzi a ochrona uczuć osób wierzących w Europejskim Trybunale Praw Człowieka – uwagi na kanwie sprawy Pussy Riot.” In: O wolność słowa i religii. Praktyka i teoria, eds. Franciszek Longchamps de Bérier, Krzysztof Szczucki, 244–262. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
Kulesza, Jan, Marcin Mrowicki. 2023. “Obraza uczuć religijnych a wolność wypowiedzi – glosa do wyroku Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka z 15.09.2022 r., 8257/13, Rabczewska przeciwko Polsce.” Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2: 44–49.
Mariański, Janusz. 2018. “Autorytet społeczny Kościoła katolickiego w Polsce w procesie przemian.” Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana 20 (5): 77–106. https://doi.org/10.12775/SPI.2017.5.004. (Crossref)
Martínez-Torrón, Javier. 2020. “Freedom of expression and abusive speech: Some thoughts in the light of recent Strasbourg judgments.” In: Staat – Religion – Recht. Festschrift für Gerhard Robbers zum 70. Geburtstag, eds. Kerstin von der Decken, Angelika Günzel, 831–846. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. (Crossref)
Martínez-Torrón, Javier. 2021. “Freedom of expression, offences to religion and public morals in Strasbourg case law.” In: The rule of law in Europe. Recent challenges and judicial responses, eds. María Elósegui, Alina Miron, Iulia Motoc, 171–198. Cham: Springer. (Crossref)
Roszkiewicz, Janusz. 2020. “Prawo do poszanowania uczuć religijnych w świetle Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności.” Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 82 (2): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2020.82.2.8. (Crossref)
Stanisz, Piotr. 2023. Religion and law in Poland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Zawiślak, Michał. 2023. “Conflict between freedom of expression and freedom of religion. The ECHR case of Rabczewska v. Poland, 8257/13. An approving commentary”. Studia Prawnicze KUL 3: 217–229. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.16499. (Crossref)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
PhD, Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-5826
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
- Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
- Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
- With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
- This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
