Selected issues regarding the legal position of the religious minister in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Michał Hucał
Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw, , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-0570
Abstract
The research goal is to reconstruct selected aspects of the legal position of the religious minister on the basis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis includes 33 judgments and decisions on the admissibility of complaints made by the bodies of the European Convention on Human Rights in 1976-2017. Based on them, it can be concluded that the ECtHR case law in this area is grounded in many years of practice.
The religious minister as such has no guarantees other than those of any other person professing religious beliefs, but he benefits from the indirect strengthening of this protection by virtue of the guarantees of corporate freedom of conscience and religion. It is the autonomy of a religious organization that differentiates his position in both positive and negative respects. The autonomy of a religious organization is, in the light of ECtHR jurisprudence, an important component of pluralism in democratic societies, and it also includes determining the requirements for the religious minister. For this reason, the religious minister obtains strong protection against the interference of state power in matters relating to his appointment and removal from the office. The cost of obtaining this protection is a significant limitation of his personal freedom of conscience and religion, and indirectly also other rights while in the office of a priest, in relation to a religious organization. However, it should be remembered that the assessment of matters related to the performance of the office of a priest depends on the formal relations between a religious organization and the state. In the case of state churches, it is possible, for example, to submit certain church matters to state jurisprudence, and a religious organization can perform its self-limitation by shaping relations with the religious minister on the basis of a regular employment contract. As a rule, however, the ECtHR clearly indicated that matters concerning the religious minister lie outside the jurisdiction of the state and its organs. Nevertheless, the controversy surrounding the ruling in Károly Nagy v. Hungary indicates that the religious minister’s status may undergo some changes in the future.
Keywords:
human rights, religious minister, ECtHR, European Court of Human Rights, freedom of conscience and religion, religious organization, religious freedom, Law on ReligionReferences
Borecki, Paweł, Dorota Pudzianowska. 2010. „Glosa do wyroku z 3 XI 2009 w sprawie Lautsi v. Włochy, skarga nr 30814/06”. Państwo i Prawo 4: 124-129.
Brzozowski, Wojciech. 2011, „Glosa do wyroku Wielkiej Izby z 18 III 2011 w sprawie Lautsi v. Włochy, nr skargi 30814/06”. Państwo i Prawo 11: 121-126.
Evans, Carolyn. 2001. Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garlicki, Lech, ed. 2010. Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Tom I. Komentarz do artykułów 1–18. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Garnett, Richard W. 2010. „Religious Liberty, Church Autonomy, and the Structure of Freedom”. W: Christianity and Human Rights. An Introduction, red. John Witte Jr. and Frank S. Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hucał, Michał. 2012. Ochrona wolności sumienia i wyznania w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Hucał, Michał. 2015. Oddziaływanie brytyjskiej ustawy o prawach człowieka z 1998 r. na Kościół Anglii. Toruń: Wyd. Adam Marszałek.
Kamiński, Ireneusz C. 2010 a. „Nakaz obecności krzyża we włoskiej szkole – glosa do wyroku ETPCz z 3.11.2009 w sprawie Lautsi v. Włochom”. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 3: 40-47.
Kamiński, Ireneusz C. 2010 b. „Wolność myśli, sumienia i wyznania w orzecznictwie ETPCz za lata 2008-2009”. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 11: 33-39.
Mezglewski, Artur. 2001. „Pojęcie duchownego w przepisach prawa polskiego o zawieraniu małżeństwa”. Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego 2: 3-26.
Misztal, Henryk, Piotr Stanisz. 2010. „Wolność wyznania a symbole religijne w życiu publicznym państwa świeckiego”. Annales Canonici 6: 37-55.
Nowicki, Marek Antoni. 2010. Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej. Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Kraków: Wolters Kluwer.
Osuchowska, Marta. 2011. „Pojęcie duchownego w świetle przepisów o wyznaniowej formie zawarcia małżeństwa cywilnego”. Państwo i Prawo 7-8: 67-79.
Petkoff, Peter. 2012. „Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Canon Law and Public International Law with a Particular Reference to the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights”. Religion & Human Rights 7, no 3: 183-214.
Świto, Lucjan 2010. „Charakter prawny posługi duszpasterskiej proboszczów i wikariuszy w parafiach rzymskokatolickich w świetle prawa polskiego”. Seminare 27: 41-50.
Warchałowski, Krzysztof 2004. Prawo do wolności myśli, sumienia i religii w Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Zieliński, Tadeusz J. 2012. „Zakaz indoktrynacji światopoglądowej w szkolnictwie według wyroku Lautsi przeciwko Włochom”. W: Prawne granice wolności sumienia i wyznania, red. Roman Wieruszewski, Mirosław Wyrzykowski, Lena Kondratiewa-Bryzik. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Zieliński, Tadeusz J. 2016. Państwowy Kościół Anglii. Studium prawa wyznaniowego. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe ChAT.
Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw,
Dr, Chrześcijańska Akademia Teologiczna, ul. Broniewskiego 48, 01-771 Warszawa.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-0570License
- According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
- Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
- Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
- With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
- This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
