Selected problems of the criminal responsibility of the exorcist in Polish law

Filip Ciepły

John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1124-7389


Abstract

The article discusses the issue of criminal liability for acts of the exorcist associated with disorder of possession trance during exorcism. Exorcism in the Catholic Church is a form of liturgical celebration and a subject to legal protection. The condition for the legality of exorcism is voluntary participation. An attack of possession trance is usually the cause of loss or significant limitation of person’s consciousness, so, despite of external impulses of the person’s body, the exorcist’s refusing to stop the prayer is not an unlawful behavior. Exorcist eventually could be responsible for failing to render assistance to a person in a situation threatening an immediate danger of loss of life or serious bodily injury, intentional or unintentional exposure of a person to an immediate danger of loss of life or serious bodily injury, causing heavy, medium or light bodily injury or an impairment to health or manslaughter. The issue shall be assessed in the light of principles of objective assignment of effect.

Keywords:

possession trance, exorcism, criminal liability, legal justification, canon law, Polish criminal law, religious freedom, freedom of conscience and religion, Law on Religion, freedom of religion



Amorth G., Egzorcyści i psychiatrzy, Częstochowa 1999.

Betty L.S., The Growing Evidence for Demonic Possession”: What Should Psychiatry’s Response be?, „Journal of Religion and Health” 2005, vol. 44.

Dębiec J., Opętanie. Próba psychopatologicznego ujęcia problemu, Kraków 2000.

Kocańda B., Posługa kapłana-egzorcysty. Duchowość. Tożsamość. Praktyka, Kraków 2004.

Niemann U., Wagner M., Egzorcyzmy czy terapia?, Kraków 2008.

Olszewski M., Egzorcyzm. Posługa miłości, Kraków 2013.

Salvucci R., Podręcznik egzorcysty. Jasne słowa na temat ciemnej rzeczywistości, Kraków 2009.

Sikorski D., Opętanie a choroba psychiczna – kryteria różnicujące, w: Szatan w religii i kulturze, red. S. Bukalski, Szczecin 2008.

Zięba J., Egzorcyści. Historia – teologia – prawo – duszpasterstwo, Kraków 2012.

Zoll A., Komentarz do art. 189 k.k., LEX 2014.


Published
2014-12-30


Ciepły, F. (2014). Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące odpowiedzialności karnej egzorcysty w prawie polskim. Studia Z Prawa Wyznaniowego, 17, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.31743/spw.5113

Filip Ciepły  fcieply@kul.pl
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Wydział Zamiejscowy Prawa i Nauk o Społeczeństwie w Stalowej Woli, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, ul. Ofiar Katynia 6a, 37-450 Stalowa Wola

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1124-7389



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
  2. Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
  3. Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
  4. With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
  5. This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)