Acting on the behalf of legal entities of the Catholic Church in the light of the Austrian Supreme Court's judgements

Marek Strzała

Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University, , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-3464


Abstract

The Austrian Supreme Court, in a similar way to the Polish Supreme Court, states that canon law rules governing church property are relevant in the field of acts of legal entities of the Catholic Church. Hence, the views and arguments presented in its judgements in cases concerning the management of ecclesiastical property are also important for Polish legal practice. Between 1959 and 2013 a number of judgements were issued. There were a variety of cases, starting from the sale of the immovable property, through leasing it, and ending with the sale of fishery rights and contract of employment. In relation to those events a number of relevant legal views were stated by the Austrian Supreme Court. It considered the meaning of the term “alienation” (in the strict and broad sense), the obligation of a judge to examine canon law requirements for managing ecclesiastical property, the relevance of the particular canon law, the possibility of giving consent required by canon law per facta concludentia and scope of proxy authorization to manage church property. The question of treating the lease as an alienation in terms of the Code of Canon Law has also been raised. The case-law deals with many problems associated with the application of canon law in practice and provides a number of arguments to the parties in possible court proceedings.

Keywords:

Catholic Church, canon law, Code of Canon Law, religious organization, Church-State relations, Austria, religious communities, alienation, ecclesiastical property, Supreme Court, canon law reception, Law on Religion



Beal, John P., James A. Coriden, Thomas J. Green (red.). New commentary on the Code of Canon Law. Mahwah: Paulist Press, 2000.

Koziol, Helmut, Peter Bydlinski, Raimund Bollenberger (red.). Kurzkommentar zum ABGB: Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Ehegesetz, Konsumentenschutzgesetz, IPR-Gesetz und Europäisches Vertragsstatutübereinkommen. Wien: Springer Verlag, 2007.

Hess, Agnieszka. Państwo a Kościół: doświadczenia austriackie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2003.

Kaleta, Paweł. „Zasady zawierania umowy dzierżawy w Kodeksie prawa kanonicznego z 1983 roku”, Annales Canonici 9 (2013), 119-137.

Krukowski, Józef (red.). Komentarz do kodeksu prawa kanonicznego z 1983 r., T. II/3. Lud Boży. Instytuty życia konsekrowanego i stowarzyszenia życia apostolskiego. Poznań: Pallotinum, 2006.

Rummel, Peter (red.). Kommentar zum Allgemeinen bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit IPR-Gesetz, Ehegesetz, Mietrechtsgesetz, Wohnungseigentumsgesetz, Landpachtgesetz, Konsumentenschutzgesetz, Produkthaftungsgesetz, UN-Kaufrecht, t. I. Wien: Manzsche Verlag und Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1990.

Rummel, Peter (red.). Meinhard Lukas, Kommentar zum Allgemeinen bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit wichtigen Nebengesetzen und EU-Verordnungen, t. §§ 859-916 ABGB. Wien: Manzsche Verlag und Universitätsbuchhandlung, 2014.

Seikel, Gregor. Umfang, Grenzen und Nachweis der Vertretungsmacht bei privaten und öffentlichen Rechtsträgern in Österreich. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 1998.

Strzała, Marek. „Skuteczność norm prawa kanonicznego w zakresie reprezentacji kościelnych osób prawnych w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego”. W: Prawo państwowe a prawo wewnętrzne związków wyznaniowych. Pamiętnik VII Zjazdu Katedr i Wykładowców Prawa Wyznaniowego, Gniezno 11-12 IX 2010, red. Krzysztof Krasowski, Małgorzata Materniak-Pawłowska, Maksymilian Stanulewicz, 211-221. Poznań: Ars boni et aequi, 2010.

Strzała, Marek. „Ograniczenia reprezentacji wyznaniowych osób prawnych Kościoła Katolickiego”. Krakowski Przegląd Notarialny 2 (2016): 107-138.

Wójcik, Walenty, Józef Krukowski, Florian Lempa, Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 r., t. 4. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 1987.


Published
2017-12-29


Strzała, M. (2017). Orzecznictwo austriackiego Sądu Najwyższego w sprawie reprezentacji wyznaniowych osób prawnych Kościoła Katolickiego. Studia Z Prawa Wyznaniowego, 20, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.31743/spw.266

Marek Strzała 
Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University,

Dr, Zakład Prawa Kościelnego i Wyznaniowego, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, ul. Gołębia 9, 31-007 Kraków

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-3464



License

  1. According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
  2. Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
  3. Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
  4. With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
  5. This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)