Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
Abstract
The present article aims to analyze selected aspects of the conflict between two basic values: freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Based on the co-called Aiisa’s case (see the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 July 2021, Ana Gachechiladze v. Georgia, App. No. 2591/19), the paper proposes general criteria for assessing insults to religious feelings. It is argued that national courts must not act as guardians of concrete religious groups or conventional morals, as this leads to negative results and destruction of the national law system. As a rule, it cannot be excluded that sacred images and figures are used in commercials or other ways of expression. When adjudicating on a case, every court should primarily consider the context, content and form, and prohibition of expression should be the last and final resort.
Keywords:
Ana Gachechiladze v. Georgia, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, religious feelings, freedom of opinion and expressionReferences
Ahdar, Rex, Ian Leigh. 2005. Religious freedom in the liberal state. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Ahdar, Rex. 2008. “The right to protection of religious feelings.” Otago Law Review 4: 629–656.
Cumper, Peter. 2017. “Blasphemy, freedom of expression and the protection of religious sensibilities in twenty-first-century Europe.” In: Blasphemy and freedom of expression: Comparative, theoretical and historical reflection after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, ed. Jeroen Temperman, András Koltay, 137–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. “The right to ridicule.” New York Review of Books 5.
Hammarberg, Thomas. 2007. “Do not criminalize critical remark against religions.” https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/do-not-criminalize-critical-remarks-against-religions [accessed: 20 April 2022].
Howard, Erica. 2018. Freedom of expression and religious hate speech in Europe. London: Routledge. (Crossref)
Jones, Peter. 2011a. “Introduction: Religion and freedom of expression.” Res Publica 17: 1–6. DOI 10.1007/s11158-011-9139-1. (Crossref)
Jones, Peter. 2011b. “Religious belief and freedom of expression: Is offensiveness really the issue?” Res Publica 17: 75–90. DOI 10.1007/s11158-011-9144-4. (Crossref)
Kelly, Richard. 2020. “Has freedom of expression been unduly restricted in Europe regarding religious matters?” Manchester Review of Law, Crime and Ethics 9: 162–213.
Kramer, Mathew H. 2021. Freedom of expression as self-restraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Parmar, Sejal. 2015. “Uprooting ‘defamation of religions’ and planting a new approach to freedom of expression at the United Nations.” In: The United Nations and freedom of expression and information: Critical perspectives, ed. Tarlach McGonagle, Yvonne Donders, 373–427. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Plant, Raymond. 2011. “Religion, identity and freedom of expression”. Res Publica 17: 7–20. (Crossref)
Stanisz, Piotr. 2020. Religion and law in Poland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Temperman, Jeroen. 2011. “Freedom of expression and religious sensitivities in pluralist societies: Facing the challenge of extreme speech.” Brigham Young University Law Review 3: 729–756.
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2021. “European Court of Human Rights: Gachechiladze v. Georgia.” https://merlin.obs.coe.int/article/9270 [accessed: 20 April 2022].
Weber, Anne. 2009. Manual on hate speech. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani University
Associate Professor of Law and Vice-Rector of Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani University, Faculty of Law, 3 Kalistrate Kutateladze Str., 0186, Tbilisi, Georgia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-3924License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
- Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
- Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
- With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
- This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
