Certificate of no impediments to marriage in the matrimonium per procura procedure
Lucjan Świto
Faculty of Theology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-4599
Małgorzata Tomkiewicz
Faculty of Theology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8854-2928
Abstract
This paper presents normative solutions concerning the issuing procedure, the content and the significance of the certificate of no impediments to marriage in the context of regulations related to marriage by proxy (matrimonium per procura). The principal aim and the research problem posed in the article pertain to the question of the specific circumstances this document concerns. Do the control mechanisms accompanying the issuing of this certificate cover the requirements specified in Art. 6.1 of the Family and Guardianship Code, and do they recognize the specificity of marriage contracted by proxy? What is the actual meaning of the phrase used in Art. 8.1 of the Family and Guardianship Code, stating that a priest “cannot accept the declarations referred to in Art. 2.1 [of the Family and Guardianship Code]” without having been presented with the said certificate, and does the prohibition set forth in this regulation prove that the certificate of no impediments to marriage is the essential factor?
The paper puts forward the hypothesis that while the idea itself is undoubtedly justified, the adjustment of the regulations of the Family and Guardianship Code and the Registry Office Records Act to ensure compliance with the Concordat has gone too far in the matter under discussion. It has resulted in the introduction of restrictions establishing a clear primacy of formalism over the favor matrimonii principle and has given rise to different assessments of the nature of the said certificate, including opinions claiming the constitutive nature of this document. For persons intending to enter into marriage in the religious form with civil effects, the requirement to present a legally valid certificate has become a condition basically parallel to other, constitutive conditions to marriage, while this restriction is not of general nature. It does not apply to couples intending to contract marriage before the head of a registry office or a consul (Art. 1.1 and Art. 1.4 of the Family and Guardianship Code), and refers only to those who intend to enter into marriage in the religious form with civil effects. The existing state of affairs can hardly be regarded as appropriate. Another deficiency of the current regulations also arises from the fact that the certificate of no impediments to marriage, although it has gained disproportionate importance, does not “recognize” the specificity of religious marriages with civil effects contracted per procura, and in this case does not duly fulfil its guaranteeing functions.
Keywords:
marriage, marriage by proxy, proxy, certificate of no impediments to marriage, impediments to marriage, churches and religious organizations, religious organization, Law on ReligionReferences
Borysiak, Witold. 2014. W: Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz, red. Jacek Wierciński. Warszawa: LexNexis.
Domański, Maciej. 2017. „Komentarz do art. 4 k.r.o.”. W: Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz, red. Konrad Osajda i inni. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Haak, Henryk. 1999. Zawarcie małżeństwa. Komentarz. Toruń: TNOiK.
Krukowski, Józef. Krzysztof Warchałowski. 2000. Polskie prawo wyznaniowe, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze PWN.
Majer, Piotr. 2001. „Uwagi odnośnie do małżeństwa konkordatowego: art. 10 konkordatu z 1993 r. a ustawodawstwo państwowe”, Ius Matrimoniale 6(12): 145-163.
Majer, Piotr. 2004. „Małżeństwo jako przedmiot zainteresowania Kościoła i Państwa – prawo kanoniczne a małżeństwo cywilne”. W: Prawo wyznaniowe w systemie prawa polskiego, red. Artur Mezglewski, 255-286. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Piasecki, Kazimierz, i inni. 2011. Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Smyczyński, Tadeusz. 2002. „Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza duchownego z powodu naruszenia prawa przy zawieraniu małżeństwa”. Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny 64(2): 165-177.
Sobański, Remigiusz. 2003. „Zaświadczenie z urzędu stanu cywilnego a przesłanki małżeństwa konkordatowego”. Państwo i Prawo 5: 30-33.
Świto, Lucjan. 2014. „Zasada favor matrimonii w Kodeksie Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 r.”. W: Favor matrimonii? Teoria i praktyka, red. Lucjan Świto, Małgorzata Tomkiewicz, 59-70. Olsztyn: Wydział Teologii UWM.
Świto, Lucjan. Małgorzata Tomkiewicz. 2018. „Czynności administracyjne i cywilnoprawne poprzedzające zawarcie małżeństwa konkordatowego przez pełnomocnika w Polsce”, Annales Canonici 2: 14-24.
Tunia, Anna. 2017. „Procedura zawarcia małżeństwa konkordatowego – administracyjna czy cywilna?”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 81: 83-97.
Zielonacki, Andrzej. 1982. Zawarcie małżeństwa. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Żurawińska, Oliwia. 2012. „Małżeństwo konkordatowe zawarte przez pełnomocnika (uwagi na tle prawa polskiego i kanonicznego)”. Rejent 3: 131-157.
Faculty of Theology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn,
Ks. dr hab., prof. UWM, Katedra Prawa Kanonicznego i Filozofii, Wydział Teologii, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul. Kard. Hozjusza 15, 11-041 Olsztyn
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-4599Faculty of Theology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn,
Dr, Katedra Prawa Kanonicznego i Filozofii, Wydział Teologii, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul. Kard. Hozjusza 15, 11-041 Olsztyn, sędzia Sądu Okręgowego w Olsztynie.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8854-2928License
- According to the Act of 4 February 1994 on copyright and related rights, the author of a publication transfers to the publisher the proprietary copyright of his or her work in all fields of exploitation known on the date of concluding an agreement with the publisher.
- Texts submitted for publication in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowegocannot infringe the copyright of third parties. The author declares the originality of his or her publication when completing a declaration and signing a publishing agreement.
- Authors are permitted to post the publisher's version of their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories, academia.edu, researchgate.net or on their website) after its initial publication in this journal.
- With the consent of the editors, texts published in Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego can be republished in other publications (provided that their original place of publication is acknowledged).
- This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
